The Nature of Non-Acceptance ...
(Top Posts - Distance From Belief
in christianity - 011401)

... How do you get to heaven and avoid hell, per Islam?

How do you get to heaven and avoid hell, per Hinduism?

How do you get to heaven and avoid hell, per Buddhism?

How do you get to heaven and avoid hell, per the various
aspects of Christianity, for the Catholic view and the
Protestant view and the Mormon view and the Jehovah's
Witness view, just to name a few Christian views, there?

How to you get to heaven and avoid hell, per Judaism?

Is there a heaven, any heaven as iterated by any religion?

Is there a hell, any hell as iterated by any religion?

Honestly, ask yourself the questions iterated above,
just a few of the key questions regarding religion, and
can you make sense of it all on a level that bespeaks
of any singular faith or faith for all making more sense
than non-acceptance of faith?

If non-acceptance of faith makes more sense than
acceptance of faith (key point, there, as that's a
rational / logical issue to be considered apart from
social / cultural influences, as the claims made for a
foreign religion apart from one's culture, like Hinduism
for most readers of this post, for example, must be
given equal weight, on a rational/logical basis, to the
claims made for the other religions listed in this post,
not to mention the religions not listed in this post)

-and-

There is a legitimate and sincere desire to promote
the best life on earth for all humans, then ...

... Doesn't it make more sense to pursue pro-human
efforts free of faith than it does to rely on a single
faith or faith combo just for the sake of clinging to
something akin to the social / cultural influences you've
been exposed to from birth?

Isn't that a good thing, the effort to be pro-human free
from trying to mold it to the religions created for a vari-
ety of reasons by a variety of folks, with said religions
impossible to reconcile with one another?

God? Ask a Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Catholic, Protes-
tant, Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, or other individual
of faith, and you'll get a milieu of distanced or genuine
replies, and you'll find it's extremely hard to get a handle
on what, exactly, the God being talked about is, as they
just don't reconcile with one another unless you diminish
them to something akin to that which does not justify a
Hindu being any different from a Buddhist or Catholic
and, when taken one small step further, you have all
humans for all humans whether there's a god of any
religion or not. ...

Anyway, I digress, the point I'm making is that you can
be very pro-human, loving, giving, caring, kind, gentle,
nurturing, benefiting, contributory, creative, naturally-
inclined towards positivity, truthful, and a whole host
of other generally and wonderfully good and uplifting
levels, being a complete and fulfilled human being in
a world of wonder ...

... by *choosing* to be pro-human, free of faith.

It's an alternative for you and yours, through which
humans can try to make a better world for us and our
children, taking full and total responsibility for our fate
free of faith. It's a good thing, apart from that which
many religious authority figures and foundational reli-
gious documents say.

Look to the good side of being human, your nurturing,
giving, caring, loving side. Know that you can *choose*
to be that way without threats and imaginary beings
being involved.

See FREELOVER link in sig for details, and if you keep
the faith, any faith, please do it with love for your fellow
humans, in this life, on this earth, at this time, in full know-
ledge of that which is a natural world that enables humans
to *choose*, and it is a choice each of us can make, to
*choose* to be pro-human.

- - -

¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤ - ¤

~~~
Pro-Humanist FREELOVER
http://myweb.cableone.net/prohuman
Freethinking Realist Exploring
Expressive Liberty, Openness,
Verity, Enlightenment, & Rationality
~~~